Can We Bring Science to Sales Development? Testing Complex B2B Lead Generation

This is the second part of a series which asks the question, “Is Teleprospecting Too Complex for Testing?” The first post outlined what could seem to be insurmountable teleprospecting testing challenges. This post looks at how teleprospecting can be successfully tested.

nikhil nikhil
Dec 2, 2024 - 17:51
0 1
Can We Bring Science to Sales Development? Testing Complex B2B Lead Generation

In my previous post, we explored whether Sales Development was too complex for meaningful testing. Today, let me share why I believe we can and must test SDR effectiveness—and how to do it systematically.

The Testing Paradox in Sales Development

Here’s something that fascinates me: While B2B companies invest heavily in sales development programs, many shy away from rigorous testing because it seems too complex. But consider this – isn’t the entire market a massive testing ground?

Think about it: Every successful company, from early Microsoft to modern tech unicorns, represents a successful market experiment. Their growth wasn’t random – it resulted from continuous testing and adaptation.

Three Key Principles for Testing SDR Programs

Through my research and work with B2B companies, I’ve discovered three essential elements for effective testing:

1. Start with Proven Models

Before testing new approaches, understand what’s already working:

  • What profiles make successful SDRs?
  • Which training methods drive results?
  • How should compensation be structured?
  • What metrics matter?
  • How should sales and marketing align?

Learn from existing models before innovating. This gives you an informed foundation for testing.

2. Focus on First Touch

What is the most crucial moment to test? The initial connection. While marketing might generate leads through various channels, the SDR’s first engagement is critical.

Modern channels include:

  • Personalized outbound calls
  • Strategic email sequences
  • LinkedIn engagement
  • Video messages
  • Intelligent chat

3. Measure Economic Impact

Every test must consider:

  • Cost per touch
  • Revenue potential
  • Conversion rates
  • Time investment
  • Overall ROI

What We’ve Learned from Millions of Interactions

Let me share some insights from analyzing over 5 million sales development interactions:

Timing Matters (But Not How You Might Think)

  • Immediate automated response = Good
  • Phone call within the first hour = Bad
  • Follow-up within 24 hours = Optimal
  • Beyond 24 hours = Significant drop in engagement

Why? Call too soon, and prospects feel stalked. Wait too long, and you’ll lose momentum.

The Multi-Channel Engagement Formula

Here’s what we’ve found works:

1. Email Strategy

  • Send from individual SDR accounts
  • Reference upcoming phone contact
  • Position SDR as a helpful resource
  • Provide immediate value

2. Call Strategy

  • Reference previous engagement
  • Focus on helping, not selling
  • Offer relevant resources
  • Build genuine connection

3. Digital Presence

  • Professional LinkedIn profile
  • Consistent value sharing
  • Authentic engagement
  • Industry insights

Making Testing Work

Success in testing SDR programs comes from:

  1. Clear research questions
  2. Controlled variables
  3. Measurable outcomes
  4. Systematic documentation
  5. Continuous refinement

Looking Forward

The future of Sales Development lies in systematic testing and optimization. As one sales leader recently told me, “We stopped guessing and started testing. Our results doubled in six months.”

What aspects of your Sales Development program are you testing? What have you learned? Share your experiences in the comments below.

Read More